The interval tag is awful. It has 94 threads and the following excerpt:
Statistical intervals, such as confidence, credible, prediction or tolerance intervals.
but in fact we have separate well-established tags for confidence-interval (2k), credible-interval (60), prediction-interval (200), and tolerance-interval (30). I would say it makes sense to replace [interval]
with more specific tags everywhere where applicable.
What is worse, is that [interval]
tag is often used to refer to "interval data" -- a term that has nothing to do with any of the mentioned statistical intervals. See. e.g. 24 questions tagged with [interval] and [ordinal]. This usage is directly against the wiki excerpt. I would say that we do not need any tag for interval data because all data are interval unless stated otherwise. Alternatively, we can retag those with [interval-data]. What do you think?
Under what conditions should Likert scales be used as ordinal or interval data?
that currently have an [interval] tag be retagged with [interval-data]? I'd say not, it's enough to have [ordinal] there. $\endgroup$[interval]
in the cases where users mean[interval-censoring]
is that often these questions are "My data lies in an interval; what do I do?". In such cases, if the users were familiar with the term "interval-censoring", they probably would not have this question. To be clear, I'm still for removing[interval]
, so I don't buy that argument. $\endgroup$