Questions tagged [tag-reorganization]
For issues with ambiguous/suboptimal tags that require manual reorganization (i.e. cannot be resolved by creating a tag synonym or deleting a tag).
28
questions
2
votes
1answer
87 views
The “mixture” vs. the “compound-distributions” tags
TL;DR:
I have added a tag wiki and an excerpt to compound-distributions. The excerpt notes that these are also known as "mixtures", but that that term also has other uses.
I have included a warning ...
11
votes
1answer
196 views
How to improve the description and usage of the [machine-learning] tag?
I've noticed that a specific user has engaged in a campaign to add the tag machine-learning to a number of posts that do not mention machine learning, particularly posts about neural-networks.
I don'...
8
votes
1answer
100 views
Why do we have the [tag:coding] tag?
We have a tag for coding. But the description for the tag says it shouldn't be used and that it should be eliminated.
It seems that either we should actually eliminate the tag; or else we should ...
7
votes
1answer
148 views
Meta-analysis of the meta-analysis tags
There are meta-analysis×654 and meta-regression×101 tags. Meta-regression is a particular approach to meta-analysis so it's a subset tag. 90 out of 101 Qs are also tagged with [meta-analysis], i.e. ...
8
votes
1answer
132 views
Should we do something about [mixed-design] tag?
I noticed that we have mixed-design×63 tag that did not have any wiki excerpt. Many of the questions are about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-design_analysis_of_variance, i.e. ANOVA analysis with ...
6
votes
2answers
170 views
What to do about the [control] tag?
We have a tag control with 141 threads. It has no wiki excerpt and statistical-control is a synonym of it. The absence of a wiki excerpt is wise since the threads range from control groups, control ...
7
votes
1answer
115 views
“Benchmark” tag is ambiguous
We have an ambiguous benchmark tag that has 23 questions but no usage guidance and seems to be being used for several quite different things.
Some questions are asking about benchmarks for ...
8
votes
1answer
91 views
Ambiguous [fisher] tag should be disambiguated
We have an ambiguous fisher tag that says right in the tag excerpt that it's ambiguous and should better be avoided. @gung moved most of the questions out of it several years ago, but did not empty it ...
14
votes
4answers
288 views
Confusing [moving-average] tag: split into two?
Moving average and moving-average model are two quite different animals, but they seem to be conflated in the name and the description of the moving-average tag. The excerpt implies moving average, ...
12
votes
1answer
137 views
What's the tag “empirical” meant to convey?
Reading this question How is empirical bayes valid? I thought it needed an empirical-bayes tag and so I came across the tag empirical.
It has 98 questions tagged in really diverse topics and no ...
4
votes
1answer
81 views
What should we do about the [hierarchical] tag?
(Note this previous, related discussion: Redundant tags: mixed effects and related models.)
The hierarchical tag is very ambiguous. Unfortunately, this hasn't been addressed before and it now has ...
asked May 14 '17 at 18:06
6
votes
1answer
59 views
Sort out [hotelling] into [hotelling-t2]
We have a hotelling tag with 24 Qs, no excerpt, and unclear scope. We also have a hotelling-t2 with only 8 Qs, but with an excerpt, and clear scope.
I suggest that we need to go through all [...
11
votes
1answer
259 views
The [ordinal] tag and ordered logistic regression
Consider the following tags:
ordinal (678)
ordinal-logit (3)
ordinal-probit (1)
ordered-logit (62)
ordered-probit (13)
proportional-odds (2)
The ordinal-logit, ordered-logit, and proportional-odds ...
10
votes
2answers
524 views
Tags around categorical data coding / representation
Return back to the issue, June 30, 2017
I want to bring your attention once again to this tag question about categorical data encoding. It has not been resolved satisfactory so far, to me.
1) I ...
9
votes
1answer
68 views
Pointless [discriminant] tag
We have discriminant with 35 Qs, no wiki excerpt, and unclear scope, that nevertheless has a synonym: discrimination.
At least half of the threads should be re-tagged to discriminant-analysis. The ...
7
votes
1answer
91 views
Ambiguous [randomization] tag and friends
The current randomization tag has no wiki or excerpt and its 130 questions cover a wide variety of topics. I propose the following
many of the entries are about random allocation in the context of ...
7
votes
1answer
122 views
Ambiguous [interval] tag
The interval tag is awful. It has 94 threads and the following excerpt:
Statistical intervals, such as confidence, credible, prediction or tolerance intervals.
but in fact we have separate well-...
12
votes
2answers
134 views
Understanding the use of the [science] tag
What's the use of the science tag, given that one might expect most questions on this website to be related to science?
8
votes
1answer
86 views
Tidying up [replic*] tags
Consider the following tags:
replicability (4): "the extent to which subsequent studies of the same phenomenon reproduce the results obtained in the original study" (excerpt)
replication (49) - no ...
15
votes
1answer
291 views
Understanding the use of the [education] tag
What's the use of the education tag, given that we have the learning and teaching tags?
5
votes
1answer
130 views
Can we do something about the confusing/ambiguous [random-effects-model] and [fixed-effects-model] tags?
I want to discuss the following three tags: mixed-model (2000+), random-effects-model (580) and fixed-effects-model (400).
There is a well-known terminological ambiguity between econometrics and ...
6
votes
2answers
323 views
A pair of ambiguous tags: [nested] and [non-nested]
We have nested with 216 Qs and also non-nested with 22 Qs. Neither tag has a wiki excerpt. Both are terribly ambiguous.
AFAIK, "nested" can refer (and this tag is being used to refer) to various ...
11
votes
1answer
176 views
Ambiguous [permutation] tag
A week ago @JuhoKokkala raised the following Meta question: Ambiguous [combination] tag -- and the consesus was that [combination] tag should be entirely removed and replaced by [combinatorics] ...
10
votes
1answer
257 views
Ambiguous [combination] tag
See combination (113 threads). Some of these are combinatorics questions about counting combinations, some are about linear combinations, combining distributions, combining this, combining that... The ...
11
votes
7answers
170 views
Weights and everything weighted
@amoeba and I had a lengthy (and hence not particularly productive, if the sheer length is any indication of the proximity to consensus) discussion of tag synonyms in the main "Tag synonyms candidates"...
7
votes
1answer
178 views
What are the [scoring] and [scores] tags about?
I just noticed that we have scoring tag -- what is it about? It does not have description. It's content is pretty chaotic: from Good books/papers on credit scoring (my initial guess for what is it ...
8
votes
1answer
190 views
What should we do with the ambiguous [Pearson] tag?
Our pearson tag (220 questions) is ambiguous and seems to be used inconsistently: it can refer either to Pearson's correlation or to Pearson's chi-squared goodness of fit test.
I think it should be ...
17
votes
2answers
347 views
Rank-related tags are an enormous mess
We have the following rank-related tags:
mann-whitney-u-test (271) -- ranksum test
wilcoxon (297) -- used for ranksum and for signed-rank
signed-rank-test (37)
sign-test (21)
spearman (134)
spearman-...
