20,739
reputation
8
4

probabilityislogic

Statistics tragic, most definitely an objective Bayesian style statistician. I find myself quite compelled by the "probability as extended logic" philosophy, particularly the work of Edwin Jaynes. I have also derived on of the most important rules ever: BAYESIAN+JAYNES=JAYNESIAN. lol. But seriously, I am in awe of this guy: he is like the "Jesus" of statistical thinking.

I also quite dislike the use of the word "prior beliefs" which gets attach to prior probabilities in the Bayesian world. It brings over the wrong connotations - I think "prior assumptions" or "prior state of knowledge" better describes what is actually encapsulated by "the prior" of Bayesian statistics.

Which is worse: a frequentist who refuses to use prior's (but is happy to assume a likelihood) or a subjective Bayesian who claims that they can be whatever you "believe"?

0
answers
1
question
~81
people reached
  • Australia
  • Member for 9 years
  • 20 profile views
  • Last seen Feb 18 '16 at 12:43

Top tags (1)

Score 0
Posts 1
Posts % 100

Top posts (1) All Questions Answers | Votes Newest

Badges (12)

Gold

Silver

8

Rarest

Bronze

4

Rarest