I was doing an image search for other examples of something relating to a question I had already asked on Cross Validated, and came across this word-for-word copy:


CV original is here:

How to interpret a missing data combination-frequency plot (e.g. VIM::aggr)

  • 12
    $\begingroup$ There are sites that scrub the internet & repost SE content. Given that everything is posted under CC policy, it may be legal if properly attributed. $\endgroup$ Aug 31, 2022 at 11:19
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ See law.stackexchange.com/q/82763 $\endgroup$ Aug 31, 2022 at 11:46
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ An excellent rule is never to visit "forums" or other sites that only repost material, especially when it's unattributed. That is prima facie evidence that they are dishonest, so why waste your time on them? $\endgroup$
    – whuber Mod
    Aug 31, 2022 at 15:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There was a mechanism to report sites to stackexchange that fail to abide by the license conditions; in the past I even used it at some point. I presume it still exists. $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Sep 1, 2022 at 1:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Glen_b The mechanism is the contact form. ?topic=10, though the extra boxes don't appear when I put that in the URL. $\endgroup$
    – wizzwizz4
    Sep 8, 2022 at 22:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks, yes, that's it. When I manually choose the topic from the list, at least, I get these relevant boxes come up: Link to the site reproducing Stack Exchange content [...] Link to the corresponding content on our site [...] Search terms [...] Please include anything else you find relevant (optional) [...] $\endgroup$
    – Glen_b
    Sep 8, 2022 at 23:44


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .