This is intended to be a "humorous and friendly thread on how to ask a horrible question" (amoeba) which can help new users understand how to write good questions.

We hope you will contribute one "suggestion" per reply. Include (if you wish) its rank in the top ten reasons to close questions. But please add some explanation of why your suggestion is bad and (also if you wish) how to improve such questions.

One possible use of the replies in this thread will be targets of links provided in comments to closed questions.


  1. The title is "Statistics question."

On a statistics site, this is meaningless. Good titles attract good readers. Make yours count. Use key words that clearly indicate what your question is about and how it might differ from similar ones.

(Often such titles reflect carelessness and lack of thought: they tend to be accompanied by questions elsewhere on our Top Ten list, such as copy-pasted homework. Such posts will usually be closed within minutes without further explanation.)


See our "TenFold" chat thread beginning at for the first incarnation of this list. Thanks to Amoeba, Scortchi, user777, er, GeneralAbrial, um, Sycorax $\checkmark$, NickCox, Silverfish, Glen_b, usεr11852, Matthew, (and any others I may have overlooked) for your suggestions. Feel free to borrow from and expand on those ideas.

  • 5
    This could also be extended to "How to ask question that will never be answered?". – Tim Jul 2 '16 at 17:32
  • @Tim Yeah, would be a good post. I'd never answer a question whose solution can be easily googled. Shows a significant lack of effort on the OP's part :) – Dawny33 Jul 5 '16 at 4:48
  • 1
    I would love to see a variation on this question that is about "how to turn something that looks bad, but isnt, into something good" with emphasis on the transformation. If the "how to write a good question" was all powerful then .... ... perhaps effective reduction of bad questions could come from "how to transform". – EngrStudent Oct 13 '16 at 15:04

16 Answers 16

Questions which are just photographs of your homework sheet or old exam paper

enter image description here

Why these questions are closed

We have a policy on self-study questions, which says that:

It is okay to ask about homework. Homework is included in this self-study tag. This site exists to help people learn and provide a standard repository for questions in statistics and machine learning, both simple and complex, and this includes helping students.

However, we ask that you fulfil certain conditions, including:

  • Make a good faith attempt to solve the problem yourself first. If don't seem to be making a genuine attempt, your question might be voted down or closed.

  • Be honest about the source of the question. Do this by adding the self-study tag and mentioning whether it is for some class in the question text.

Just showing us a picture of the question doesn't show us what you've tried or where you're stuck, or indeed that you've made a good faith attempt at the question at all. Also, if you haven't typed anything, then we won't know what the original source of your question is. If your homework comes from a textbook, for instance, you should give a full reference (citation) to acknowledge its authorship.

Photographs of your question are also inconvenient for other reasons. They can be difficult to read, particularly if the quality of the photograph is poor. The text is inaccessible to users using screen readers. Moreover, the text is not searchable, either through our site search or external search engines — this goes against our objective of producing a high quality repository of statistics questions and answers that future readers can learn from. If your question can't be found, then other people will not be able to learn from it!

Sometimes people resort to taking a photograph of their homework because they do not feel able to copy the formatting. Our site has typesetting features for text and equations (using LaTeX) — see our editing help for further information. There are situations where photographs are appropriate, for instance if you want to ask what an unclear piece of notation means (and because it's not clear to you what it is, you can't typeset it), you are struggling with how to use LaTeX for an equation or table (some of our helpful users may edit your question to assist you with this), or you need to show us a graph or diagram. However, even in these cases it's best for your question not to just consist of a photograph! Type the question you have, and show us a picture of what you can't type.

  • 25
    As a legally blind guy, I really wish it were more commonly known that text should always be provided as text, not an image. – Kodiologist Jul 2 '16 at 13:48
  • 2
    There is also some information about using our mathjax / $\LaTeX$ markdown options here: Reviewing questions and applying LaTeX format. – gung Jul 2 '16 at 15:27
  • 13
    @Kodiologist Thanks -- it's very useful when visually impaired users identify themselves. I used to put at least briefly descriptive alt text on almost all images I put in my posts but I got the distinct impression nobody ever saw them -- so since it was taking time I could spend on other activities, I stopped doing it. You're the second user I'm aware of that it could possibly matter to, so I'll try to get back in the habit of doing it. When editing posts I sometimes try to convert images of text to text as well (but they're often poor self-study posts -- if it's likely to close, I won't). – Glen_b Jul 3 '16 at 1:08
  • 8
    That image is meta as meta gets... :) – J. M. is not a statistician Jul 7 '16 at 9:41
  • 3
    @J.M. It's even posted on the meta forum! – Sycorax Jan 19 '17 at 1:21
  • 3
    I do love it when they at least type the question verbatim on the site, but add nothing more. The question is often phrased as a command (e.g. "find the value of $w$ that has the highest probability of generating $x$"). I often interpret it as a command by the OP, and I'm tempted to comment, "Yes sir!" – Bridgeburners Dec 5 '17 at 18:31
  • 1
    Which flag should be used on such questions? (after OP refuses to make the changes himself) – Jim May 16 at 8:02
  • 1
    @Jim That is an interesting point. There is an "off-topic" close reason for self-study questions that show insufficient effort which usually would cover such questions. – Silverfish May 18 at 17:37

Questions which contain a large number of undefined abbreviations or acronyms

One of our close reasons is "Unclear what you are asking."

I'm comparing an XYZ model to a YYZ model using the ABC and DAR statistics. Using the LLV test on the OOP dataset, my results are not good. Perhaps I failed at TTR?

CrossValidated is a site for everyone, not just working or practicing statisticians or scientists. Questions that contain multiple (or sometimes even single) undefined abbreviations may be not understandable to a large number of otherwise interested readers.

As a rule, good scientific writing should avoid unnecessary abbreviations, if you only use a phrase once or twice, please take the time to type out the entire thing

I am confused by the formula for confidence interval given in my textbook. It seems to rely on the z-scores from the standard normal distribution, but I'm having trouble conceptualizing where the normal distribution comes into play in this situation (...describe situation...). I'd like to know, what is the relation between the z-score and the confidence interval in this situation?

You may think that confidence interval is such a common term that everyone will immediately recognize CI as a substitute, but consider a very beginner searching for an answer to their question:

Search: Confidence intervals and z scores

If you have abbreviated to CI all your references to the subject of your question, this user will never uncover your question or answer.

If you must repeatedly refer to a complex multi word term in your question or answer, please define your abbreviation or acronym on first use

I'm wondering about how Hyper-Complex Kahler Manifolds with a Holomorphic One Form (CKMwaH1F) ...

One last point that follows from the previous. Please avoid abbreviations completely in question titles. Titles are meant to be consumed quickly and give a summary of content to tell the reader if they have possible interest in the question, you are only doing yourself a disservice if you alienate a few readers by using unknown abbreviations.

Of course, there are counterexamples to this advice. Some abbreviations have become so standardized in our common language that the abbreviation/acronym has become the name, ANOVA being a prime example. This poster urges you to use your best discretion, but lean towards utmost sympathy to your readers. When in doubt, write it out.

  • 5
    Re the final paragraph - some abbreviations are okay (ANOVA for instance is rarely written unabbreviated!) so perhaps the best guidance is slightly more subtle than a blanket preference for everything to be written in full – Silverfish Jul 2 '16 at 19:17
  • 3
    (Of course, if you're someone who doesn't know much about statistics, or you've only seen an idea once, you may have no idea if the "usual" way it is written is abbreviated or not! So I can sympathise with posters who struggle with such conventions. But since so many TLAs are ambiguous, encouraging to write acronyms and abbreviations in full when in doubt, at least at their first mention, is sensible advice.) – Silverfish Jul 2 '16 at 22:34
  • @Silverfish I took a shot at making your point in my answer. Feel free to edit to better capture your intent! – Matthew Drury Jul 2 '16 at 23:10
  • That looks good to me! But if I can come up with a more elegant way to rephrase it, I'll come back to it. – Silverfish Jul 2 '16 at 23:12

Not carefully developing a question to ask of your data

As Scortchi put it (his ellipsis):

[…] How can I analyze these data?

This quip exemplifies questions that describe a dataset and then ask what data-analytical, statistical, mathematical, programmatical, or machine-learning-ical tools to throw at the data—"What do I do with the data?"—without being reasonably specific about what the asker wants to achieve with data analysis. Data analysis is not a machine where you stick data in one end and get an APA-formatted results section out the other. It is a set of tools to help you answer questions about data. You need to decide on some questions to ask before the tools can do you any good.

To avoid this problem, try to do two things whenever you ask a question:

  1. Provide broader context. Why are you looking at this data to begin with? What were you hoping to learn, at the big-picture level?

  2. Focus your question enough to ask about a particular aspect of the data. Which variable (or variables) do you think of as the outcome? Are you interested in building a predictive model, identifying causes, summarizing a large dataset, searching for certain cases, or something else?

I personally like the "questions":

I have a dataset consisting of vectors of numbers and I want to predict values from other vector of numbers. Any help will be appreciated. Thx

Why it gets closed?

First of all, what is the question in here? Is there any? Nothing was asked, so it's hard to answer anything.

  • 1
    My problem when folks ask questions like this is that they come across as an amazingly passive/half-dead request for help. In terms of effective response (think Gladwell/Outliers) the most effective response can be elicited from the most complete, direct, and non-passive approach. – EngrStudent Oct 13 '16 at 15:01
  • @EngrStudent I don't disagree, but cultures vary in how they see this - and in some, being outspoken can be perceived as aggressive or obnoxious. Definitely agree that these need to be closed, though. – mkt Aug 13 at 14:04

It begins "How do I use SPSS to..."

I was advised to do [procedure X] in SPSS. Here's a dump of the output. How do I interpret it?

Yes, I am singling out SPSS because it is prominently associated with bad questions. Of course there are thoughtful SPSS users out there, newbies and students included. Please formulate your question in a way that reflects that!

  • 6
    And a lot of our Python questions are to machine learning what SPSS is to statistics. – Sycorax Nov 1 '16 at 13:47

"I am working on my dissertation..."

Why is this a negative point? It may seem entirely natural as a lead-in, but it's a bad start.

We think statistically (what else did you expect?). A large fraction of questions starting like that turn out to be poor questions. Your question isn't doomed by such a start, but you should want to create a good first impression. You won't want to lose readers because they have previously found such questions unappealing and back off immediately.

Why is it bad?

  • We don't need to know that. It is not important information. The important information is the statistical question you want to ask. Whether that question arises in coursework, in preparing a dissertation or thesis, or in working towards a report or research paper is not crucial at all. Such context is a distraction on a par with whether it's Tuesday or the weather is good where you are. Tell us about your question: what you understand and what you need to know.

  • Whether you are a student doesn't make a difference. Often it creates the expectation that you are going to plead -- or at least to imply -- that you're a student in special need of support. But the forum doesn't care who you are. There isn't a queue you can jump by being needier than anyone else. We have no way of judging who needs an answer most. We just care about whether you have a good question.

These may seem small points, even petty, but your question is jostling for attention with many others, so you should want it to look good.

There are ways to make this kind of question even less attractive, so we will pile on with those too.

  • Don't imply that you don't respect statistics. Never give the impression that you regard the statistical part of what you're doing as boring and unnecessary technical stuff, a hurdle you're obliged to jump before you can finish your degree. You may think that quietly to yourself, but special pleading that you're not really that statistically-minded won't make your question more attractive or easier to answer. You can and should be honest about your technical level, but should feel no need to apologize for it. Perhaps you never took the right courses or they were not taught in a way that helped you. Just don't convey a lack of respect for statistics. If you don't respect what we do, don't expect copious and willing help.

  • Don't try emotional blackmail: it backfires. Never plead urgency, desperation, or your earnest need to finish. Don't claim a deadline tomorrow or that you've spent hours watching videos and Googling without any result except getting more frustrated and more confused. All this may be completely true, but it doesn't make a question a better question if you add layers of pleading or attempts at tweaking our heartstrings. We've been there ourselves. We know that there are bad reasons too for being in a mess, which we should not need to spell out.

It should seem obvious: Just ask the statistical question clearly, concisely, and concretely. No need for personal history, special pleading, and least of all for thinly veiled emotional blackmail.

  • 4
    +1. I totally agree in the emotional blackmail part. I find it totally irrational. – usεr11852 Jan 3 '17 at 23:53
  • 3
    I think there are times when "I am working on my dissertation" can be relevant (such as to clarify what looks as if it might be simple homework is actually something else; I've seen this with some dissertation posts where the author tries to turn their problem into some artificial situation - often obscuring necessary information out of ignorance - it often ends up looking like a mangled homework question). There are also times when it might affect the kinds of advice offered (if it's a dissertation there will typically be different expectations on the asker than if it's for a job. ... ctd – Glen_b Apr 12 '17 at 2:15
  • ctd ... I agree you shouldn't ever need to lead with it. I completely agree with the rest of it and the general advice (especially about asking the statistical question clearly, concisely, and concretely). – Glen_b Apr 12 '17 at 2:17
  • 2
    @Glen_b I agree with you but the crucial detail is whether the answer would be better revised. Across countries and disciplines a dissertation can be for anything from first degree or diploma to doctorate. Expectations vary from using some elementary procedures to showing familiarity with frontier-research technique. I have seen many posts with the added flavour of "completely new to statistics" and "using X" where X can be zero-inflated negative binomial regression, mixed models, etc., etc. The central point for me is that whatever the personal context, what is good advice shouldn't vary. – Nick Cox Apr 12 '17 at 6:25
  • I should make it clear that I don't think the answer requires revision; I previously upvoted it as it stood. I just sought to note the possibility of occasional relevance of it being a thesis. – Glen_b May 31 '17 at 23:50

What was the chance of this strange personal coincidence?

I am perplexed; I just ended a relationship with a guy and 1 month later I meet another guy who has the same first name and the same first initial in the last name. Example : Torrence Tolley (1st guy) & Torrence Tiffen (2nd guy). What is the universe trying to tell me?

Yes, that's a real post from our site!--but there have been plenty of others like it.

Strange and unusual things happen all the time:

Million-to-one chances crop up nine out of ten times.

--Terry Pratchett

For an understandable explanation of the "law of very large numbers" expressed by Terry Pratchett, read Gina Kolata's NY Times article about research by Persi Diaconis and Fred Mosteller, "1-in-a-Trillion Coincidence, You Say? Not Really, Experts Find".

  • 4
    If we keep getting these then it might be worthwhile to duplicate, in some form, the A Very Lucky Wind story by RadioLab as a canonical answer and dupe all of the others. That way we don't need to answer all of these questions and the asker can get something useful. – Erik Nov 30 '16 at 21:05
  • True story: I met a man in Chile , he told this true story: many years ago, in his youth, he was in la Serena and had booked a flight to Santiago. He had some important business in Santiago, so was angry when it showed at the airport there was overbooking. Everybody busy, he lost. Angry looking at the plane taking off, disappearing at the horizon --- just to fall down in flames, no survivors. Not so angry then ... I use this story when teaching probability ... – kjetil b halvorsen Nov 27 '17 at 17:37


Why these questions are closed

Western languages differentiate between uppercase and lowercase letters. There are commonly agreed rules on when to use which. These rules are well ingrained in almost all speakers of English. The result is that, yes, we can read text that is in ALL CAPS, but it requires additional effort, simply because it does not adhere to commonly agreed rules.

If you want someone to help you, it is a good idea to make helping you as painless as possible. This includes (but is not limited to) making the minuscule extra effort of formatting your question more or less correctly.

Note that we understand that many CV users are not native speakers of English. We do not expect letter-perfect command of English. However, not typing your question in ALL CAPS should be possible for anyone who is using the internet.

One additional point: in the early days of the internet, typing in ALL CAPS was the visual equivalent of screaming. Many users here are old enough to remember that time and have the same reaction to a question in ALL CAPS that they would have to a question that was literally screamed at them.

  • 7
    (+1). I would still add that, while not a reason for immediate closing as English is indeed not most users' native language, an excessive number typos reflects that little effort has gone into the question, which increases the chances that nobody will make the effort to provide an answer either (maybe we need a sister thread "Top Ten List of Reasons not to Get an Anwswer on Your Question"?). – Christoph Hanck Jul 4 '16 at 8:17
  • 1
    @ChristophHanck +1 for planting a typo in the the suggested thread title. – amoeba Jul 4 '16 at 9:09
  • 1
    Oh, that is embarrassing in this context :-). – Christoph Hanck Jul 4 '16 at 9:13
  • 2
    That's OK @ChristophHanck, in another answer someone has an unexplained abbreviation. We are all human. – mdewey Jul 4 '16 at 10:51
  • 1
    Well, it gets worse than that - as it happens, my comment on the sister thread is a duplicate of @Tim's under the original post, while my answer suggested there should be fewer...duplicates on CV. – Christoph Hanck Jul 5 '16 at 11:46
  • 1
    "in the early days of the internet, typing in ALL CAPS was the visual equivalent of screaming" - interesting, I see it used in many forums in this way to this day and I interpret it this way - and I am not old enough to remember early days of the internet. Though maybe some interpret "before FB" as "early days of the internet", for me it would be "before Internet search was useful". – Mateusz Konieczny Jul 6 '16 at 22:05
  • 7
    "In the age of geocities and angelfire, before the great googleing..." – Matthew Drury Jul 7 '16 at 16:42

A post that shows no concern for its readers does not deserve answers.

  1. Teh speling en gramar r 2 terse and so ful of misstakes that we can scarsely reed the queston. Its ovbious teh poster hasnt even red it theyselfs!

We should be sensitive to people who are not native writers of English and work to accommodate them. Even so, there's a fairly clear line between struggling with the language and being completely careless. When the language in a post is more mangled than even a free Web translator will produce, expect people to vote to close it.

Duplicates or near duplicates

This site aims to collect questions and high-quality answers that are useful not only for the OP, but also for other readers who face the same question. This site exists for over 5 years and has seen something like 83,000 questions (as of July 2016).

So if you have a question that, for example, relates to a key topic of an introductory or intermediate statistics class, there is a very good chance that somebody else already had a similar question on this site.

It is therefore good practice to do a little search on this site before asking your own question. This has advantages for everybody:

  • It is time-saving for those users who donate their time to answer questions and moderate this site.
  • You may benefit from excellent answers that already exist, with no delay.
  • It helps keep the site uncluttered.

[We often don't close these - but I increasingly tend to think we should put them on hold until clarified]

The title is:

What test should I run?

but which contain no indication of any question of interest whatever, instead focusing entirely on a description of the data (and that usually omitting important information), as if the form of the data were the only relevant factor in deciding what tests are suitable. [The use of the word "run" rather than some other verb often acts as a hint that the asker is using SPSS.]

I blame the way stats is often taught and especially the tendency to focus on following a recipe. In particular I think these questions tend to follow from --

  • an uncritical focus on Stevens' typology (nominal/ordinal/interval/ratio) as if that were the only factor of relevance (or indeed the only way of categorizing variables).

  • prescribing some kinds of analysis and proscribing others with reference only to that typology rather than to the substantive questions of interest and to the properties of the inferential procedures considered. Many times an analysis that would be proscribed in this way (or simply not considered at all) turns out to be a perfectly sensible as a way addressing the questions of interest, while the prescribed analysis may sometimes be considerably less useful (or even misleading).

  • over-reliance on a "cheat sheet" or "summary table" or other recipe that lists an analysis to go with a form of data, which often blocks people from searching for anything better.

These questions are also associated with a common tendency to think that parametric procedures are limited to normal-theory procedures and nonparametric procedures are what you use when you reject a test of normality; often there's some perceived issue with normality that prompts the question.

Besides, the publishing house O$\hspace 0.2mm$RLY$\hspace{0.1mm} ^?$ has an entire volume dedicated to the subject.

Image of the front cover of a book in the style of an O'Reilly book, which has the title "What Test Should I run?" with subtitle "A vaguely definitive guide". There's a large black and white drawing of a bat in a very old style. The author is Noah deCernibal-Hypothesis and there's a small line right at the top that says "Asking the unanswerable question"

(click the link or the picture for a larger image)

  • 1
    I've never heard about this "typology" before so had to google - and it looks like it's Steven's, not Stephen's. – amoeba Nov 24 '16 at 16:19
  • @amoeba Ah, thanks, I'm always doing that. I meant to double check before clicking post. – Glen_b Nov 24 '16 at 16:33
  • 3
    @amoeba you have no idea how lucky you have been to have avoided it all this time. – mdewey Nov 24 '16 at 16:45
  • @mdewey Can you elaborate? I am curious. If "Steven's typology" is simply distinguishing between nominal/ordinal/interval variables, then what's wrong with it? These are indeed different. I am not quite sure why this elementary distinction deserves a name. – amoeba Nov 24 '16 at 22:08
  • @amoeba because I agree with Glen_b that many of its disciples have an uncritical acceptance of the view that it completely determines what they should do with their problem. At least, that is what I think he said in part. – mdewey Nov 24 '16 at 22:12
  • @mdewey Indeed it is. A common problem is what it leads people to do with 0-1 responses. – Glen_b Nov 25 '16 at 0:50
  • The image that was put in in an edit (thanks @Sycorax) was a bit large. I have converted to a link for now but I may come back and figure out how to make it display smaller – Glen_b Apr 11 '17 at 23:29
  • @Glen_b… I think this is what you're looking for. – Sycorax Apr 11 '17 at 23:37
  • @Sycorax Was already there, thanks (I asked some other mods). Just making sure all looked good before posting. – Glen_b Apr 11 '17 at 23:40
  • Cool. The picture is just too good for it to get lost to the chat history. – Sycorax Apr 12 '17 at 0:22

Posting a question as an introductory foray into conversation

Hey guys!

Well it seems to me like like your doing a lot of test anxiety around here. LOL Idont really understand this stuff, but i want to learn! Anyway I was just wondering if my [vague ideas about stats],or really big data/machine learning (haha jk) are even [possibly to meaningfully articulate] here.

i dont know what do you think?

Thank you very much. Avery

Treating stats.stackexchange (or any other SE) as simply an online forum for discussion should prompt immediate closure. A kind approach would be to direct the author's attention to other sites (e.g., reddit, etc.) in a comment.

  • 2
    Unfair to Averys the world over. More seriously, the pattern here is to follow a generic poor question with explanation of why it is poor and if possible what to do better. – Nick Cox Sep 20 '17 at 21:33
  • 2
    @NickCox I confess I was tickled by the prospect of the opportunity to provide an object lesson as an example. I mean lolwut?! – Alexis Sep 20 '17 at 22:04
  • 1
    @NickCox And thank you for urging my compliance with the illustrative pattern. Like my edit? – Alexis Sep 20 '17 at 22:11
  • I haven't seen questions like this here, but a pre-emptive post does no harm. Know that I had to look up "lolwut". I have seen questions answered helpfully on Reddit; in my limited sample it's Quora in which the ratio of ill-informed opinion to logic and evidence can approach singularity. You missed "Thanks in advance" which drives old fogeys to apoplexy. – Nick Cox Sep 21 '17 at 9:23

Can anybody help me?

The kind of question here often starts "I am an X working on Y" with perhaps a little more detail, and then ends with an open request for help.

Why is this a bad question? Isn't the point of CV to offer help to those who ask?

What's usually bad about this is that it confuses the site with a helpline. A helpline I'll define in the following way. It's someone's job on a helpline to be available, perhaps in a designated room, or at the end of a phone, or at an email address. If you ask for help, it's then their job to listen, very likely to ask further questions and get information from you, and provide what help they can. It's also their duty to be respectful, even deferential. Their role is always to try to help to the maximum extent (subject to various simple rules such as your being a customer or more generally entitled to help). This applies whether the person asking is (say) a customer, a student or an employee.

The helpline analogy really doesn't apply to Cross-Validated. It's no-one's job to answer your question, or even to signal their willingness to do so. That follows from the principle that no one need answer any questions at all.

The way the site works is more like this. It's your job to work hard at a good specific question. "I am working on Y" doesn't qualify. What do you want to know, concretely and precisely? Then if you did that well, it's likely that someone will want to answer. So the answer to "Can anybody help me?" is in essence that someone is likely to try, but only if you ask a good question.

How do I interpret this output?

This kind of question consists of copying and pasting some output from your software and then asking us how to interpret the output. (In really bad cases, the output isn't even formatted to respect line breaks or use of fixed width fonts and thus to echo the layout in your software, so it's essentially unreadable too.)

Why is this often a bad question?

What does "interpret" mean, any way?

Is it: Tell me what the results mean? Sometimes people want a substantive interpretation and are asking that someone writes a story for them using subject-matter knowledge, factual and theoretical. That is, it's economic data, and you want to know what a (student or beginning) economist should write to satisfy other economists. Or it's psychological or biological data or whatever; only the peer group differs, but it's the same expectation. That's usually a tough call even if experts in your field recognise the variables and could do it, but almost no-one on CV wants to help to write your term paper or project report or to draft your submission to a learned journal. We're happy to advise on specific, concrete statistical points.

Is it: I'm new to this technique and I want you to go through the output and tell me how to think about it? That's usually far too much to ask. Are we to assume that you know nothing and need everything explained? That's like asking us to write a lengthy personal tutorial, but those already exist. That's the lecture you should have had or the textbook chapter you should have read (or even the Wikipedia article that is, surprisingly, quite good). By all means, ask specific technical points, while showing that you have made some effort to understand what you are doing, but don't expect that how do I interpret this output? is a switch that will set an expert going on a detailed interpretation.

  • Your answer here has been referenced in a discussion about whether the interpretation of statistical output is on topic. My position is that in general it should be considered on topic; but I recognize that such questions could still be unclear or too broad & may be closed for those reasons. I take that to be your point here. I just don't see anything specific to output interpretation questions as necessarily making them any more or less likely to be unclear or too broad than questions on any other subject. – gung Jun 22 at 20:45
  • 1
    The main suggestion here is that such a question may be a bad question. If people stop at the title here and don't read further, they will miss the explanation of why. I've made some small edits to move closer to your point. (I've sometimes quoted this answer when a question on CV is essentially nothing but an output dump, but conversely there is no need to quote it if there is a clear statistical question.) – Nick Cox Jun 23 at 6:40
  • 1
    @gung Most of the answers in this thread are about asking questions the wrong way and flag elements that don't help a question while not necessarily being immediately fatal. For example, "I need help" usually flags a naive or unclear question. Sometimes the poster is so new to forums that it's not yet obvious that almost everyone asking needs help too. Sometimes the poster doesn't yet have a specific question. But a title starting "I need help" doesn't rule out a good question following. It can just be someone wanting to make their question human or opening a conversation. – Nick Cox Jun 23 at 7:32

I just invented a square wheel: is it a good idea?

We often have threads where someone claims to have just solved some basic problem (usually with an equally basic solution, like "you just need to add 42 to the output"). Those questions often get closed, but sometimes they get answered. The answer usually points out where the OP made a mistake that invalidated their brilliant solution.

The problems with such questions are that (a) they usually do not ask any valid question and (b) they focus on the solution rather than the problem, so it is hard to grasp what problem they are inclined to solve. Moreover, in many cases they would fit better in a discussion forum where they could be discussed, rather than a Q&A site where at best we can enumerate the reasons why the approach is right or wrong.

Such questions do not seem to fit a Q&A site unless the OP defines them in terms of a problem to be solved, rather than presenting a solution.

  • 1
    Is this similar to the XY problem? – Andre Silva Nov 27 '17 at 18:38
  • 2
    Although it's usually undesirable as a direct putdown -- as being neither courteous nor constructive -- the reaction "That's not a question; that's a statement" does often summarize posts of this kind (and some others). – Nick Cox Nov 27 '17 at 19:07

Questions that provide no information whatsoever.

My favorite of these (which I think was on another list) is:

"I have some data. Can I do a t-test?"

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .