I notice that regular Review Queue patrollers often leave a stock comment, particularly on "first posts" and "low quality posts". There are many issues that arise time and again, for example an answer which is just a link with no description, where we encourage the author to write more in case the link goes dead, or a question which should be flagged as self-study and we would prefer the author to show their attempt. Are these comments produced by template, through the review mechanism itself, or is there simply a list to copy and paste from?
-
3$\begingroup$ There's a related question here: library of helpful responses $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Mar 2, 2016 at 23:07
-
3$\begingroup$ When commenting on questions, it may also be helpful to link to our meta.CV thread, Internet Support for Statistics Software. $\endgroup$– gung - Reinstate MonicaCommented May 23, 2016 at 13:43
-
$\begingroup$ Another cross-reference is stats.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3175/… The tone of answers there is closer to "Come on, if you think about it you should see that to be a dopey question that hard to answer. You can and should try to improve it." but the style of trying to give feedback on where posters are getting it wrong is otherwise similar. $\endgroup$– Nick CoxCommented Jan 12, 2018 at 11:23
-
$\begingroup$ The original version of this question included a kvetch about how clunky the review queue is to use. It's improved a lot in recent years, so that section isn't really relevant anymore, so I have edited to try to align it with the current use of this thread as a stock comments compendium $\endgroup$– SilverfishCommented Mar 31, 2023 at 20:32
3 Answers
A compendium of comments I've found useful. Feel free to add more. The suggested replies to Answers have been moved here.
Questions
Self-study
Is this a question from a course or textbook? If so, please add the self-study tag & read its wiki.
Is this a question from a course or textbook? If so, please add the [tag:self-study] tag & read its [wiki](https://stats.stackexchange.com/tags/self-study/info).
Please add the self-study tag & read its wiki.
Please add the [tag:self-study] tag & read its [wiki](https://stats.stackexchange.com/tags/self-study/info).
Please add the self-study tag & read its wiki. Then tell us what you understand thus far, what you've tried & where you're stuck. We'll provide hints to help you get unstuck. Please make these changes as just posting your homework & hoping someone will do it for you is grounds for closing.
Please add the [tag:self-study] tag & read its [wiki](https://stats.stackexchange.com/tags/self-study/info). Then tell us what you understand thus far, what you've tried & where you're stuck. We'll provide hints to help you get unstuck. Please make these changes as just posting your homework & hoping someone will do it for you is grounds for closing.
Please type your question as text, do not just post a photograph or screenshot (see here). When you re-type the question, add the self-study tag & read its wiki. Then tell us what you understand thus far, what you've tried & where you're stuck. We'll provide hints to help you get unstuck. Please make these changes as just posting your homework & hoping someone will do it for you is grounds for closing.
Please type your question as text, do not just post a photograph or screenshot (see [here](https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3176/)). When you retype the question, add the [tag:self-study] tag & read [its wiki](https://stats.stackexchange.com/tags/self-study/info). Then tell us what you understand thus far, what you've tried & where you're stuck. We'll provide hints to help you get unstuck. Please make these changes as just posting your homework & hoping someone will do it for you is grounds for closing.
Reproducible examples
(Link is specifically for R-related questions)
Please add a reproducible example for people to work with.
Please add a [reproducible example](https://stackoverflow.com/q/5963269/) for people to work with.
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about how to use R without a reproducible example.
I'm voting to close this question as [off-topic](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) because it is about how to use R without a reproducible example.
(For coding questions other than R)
Please add a reproducible example for people to work with.
Please add a [reproducible example](https://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve) for people to work with.
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about how to use without a reproducible example.
I'm voting to close this question as [off-topic](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) because it is about how to use <!--REPLACE_ME--> without a reproducible example.
Welcome to CV, . Offering a minimal reproducible example would help immensely. Until then, all we know is that you are having trouble with your script. Without the example, every possibility is on the table, ranging from bugs in the code, to a misunderstanding of what it does, to a coding error or erroneous data.
Welcome to CV, <USER>. Offering a minimal reproducible example would help immensely. Until then, all we know is that you are having trouble with your script. Without the example, every possibility is on the table, ranging from bugs in the code, to a misunderstanding of what it does, to a coding error or erroneous data.
Ambiguous code / statistical question
Questions solely about how software works are off-topic here, but you may have a real statistical question buried here. You may want to edit your question to clarify the underlying statistical issue. You may find that when you understand the statistical concepts involved, the software-specific elements are self-evident or at least easy to get from the documentation.
Questions solely about how software works are [off-topic](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) here, but you may have a real statistical question buried here. You may want to edit your question to clarify the underlying statistical issue. You may find that when you understand the statistical concepts involved, the software-specific elements are self-evident or at least easy to get from the documentation.
No need to sign off/give thanks etc
Welcome to CV. Note that your username, identicon, & a link to your user page are automatically added to every post you make, so there is no need to sign your posts. In fact, we prefer you don't.
Welcome to CV. Note that your username, identicon, & a link to your user page are automatically added to every post you make, so there is no need to sign your posts. In fact, we prefer you don't.
On this site there's no need to say "thank you" at the end of your post - it might seem rude at first, but it's part of the philosophy of this site to "Ask questions, get answers, no distractions", and it means future readers of your question don't need to read through the pleasantries.
On this site there's no need to say "thank you" at the end of your post - it might seem rude at first, but it's part of [the philosophy of this site](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/behavior) to "Ask questions, get answers, no distractions", and it means future readers of your question don't need to read through the pleasantries.
New information in comments
Please do not give new information only in comments. Edit your question to add the new information. We want posts to be self-contained: comments can be deleted, and anyhow, information in comments is not well organized. Also, many people do not read comments.
Please do not give new information only in comments. Edit your question to add the new information. We want posts to be self-contained: comments can be deleted, and anyhow, information in comments is not well organized. Also, many people do not read comments.
Demands fast answer
Please don't say your question is urgent or ask people to answer quickly. Remember that you are asking strangers to volunteer their time to help you for free. People will respond at the rate that is comfortable for them.
Please don't say your question is urgent or ask people to answer quickly. Remember that you are asking strangers to volunteer their time to help you for free. People will respond at the rate that is comfortable for them.
Critical information for question behind link
Please paste in whatever context is necessary to understand & answer your question. We want this thread to remain valuable even if the link goes dead.
Please paste in whatever context is necessary to understand & answer your question. We want this thread to remain valuable even if the link goes dead.
Too broad
Questions in the SE system are supposed to be narrow & concrete such that they can be given a definitively correct, factual answer in at most a few paragraphs. This isn't a site for discussions or opinions.
Questions in the SE system are supposed to be narrow & concrete such that they can be given a definitively correct, factual answer in at most a few paragraphs. This isn't a site for discussions or opinions.
Refer to textbook
This question is very broad, and I believe you would profit from reading an introductory level textbook. We have a helpful list of free statistical textbooks. If afterwards you still have more specific questions, then please do ask them here. If you already have read such a textbook, please edit your question to make it more specific. Thank you!
This question is very broad, and I believe you would profit from reading an introductory level textbook. We have a helpful list of [free statistical textbooks.](https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/170/). If afterwards you still have more specific questions, then please do ask them here. If you already *have* read such a textbook, please edit your question to make it more specific. Thank you!
Specifically for forecasting:
This question is very broad, and I believe you would profit from reading an introductory level textbook, e.g., the free online Forecasting: Principles and Practice by Hyndman & Athanasopoulos. If after reading this you still have more specific questions, then please do ask them here. If you already have read such a textbook, please edit your question to make it more specific. Thank you!
This question is very broad, and I believe you would profit from reading an introductory level textbook, e.g., the free online [*Forecasting: Principles and Practice* by Hyndman & Athanasopoulos](https://otexts.org/fpp2/). If after reading this you still have more specific questions, then please do ask them here. If you already *have* read such a textbook, please edit your question to make it more specific. Thank you!
(More reasoning behind this comment can be found in this Meta answer.)
Specifically for neural networks:
This question is very broad, and I believe you would profit from reading an introductory level textbook. We have a helpful list of textbooks and courses about neural networks. If afterwards you still have more specific questions, then please do ask them here. If you already have read such a textbook, please edit your question to make it more specific. Thank you!
This question is very broad, and I believe you would profit from reading an introductory level textbook. We have a helpful list of [textbooks and courses](https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/226911/) about neural networks. If afterwards you still have more specific questions, then please do ask them here. If you already *have* read such a textbook, please edit your question to make it more specific. Thank you!
Has been discussed extensively before
Similar questions have been discussed multiple times before. Please search the site, noting the tips on advanced search options, and tell us what you found and why it didn’t meet your needs. This demonstrates that you’ve taken the time to try to help yourself, it saves us from reiterating obvious answers, and above all, it helps you get a more specific and relevant answer!
Similar questions have been discussed multiple times before. Please [search the site](https://stats.stackexchange.com/search), noting the [tips](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/searching) on advanced search options, and tell us what you found and why it didn’t meet your needs. This demonstrates that you’ve taken the time to try to help yourself, it saves us from reiterating obvious answers, and above all, it helps you get a more specific and relevant answer!
Duplicate question
I think you will find the information you need in the linked thread. Please read it. If it isn't what you want or you still have a question afterwards, come back here & edit your question to state what you learned & what you still need to know. Then we can provide the information you need without just duplicating material elsewhere that already didn't help you.
I think you will find the information you need in the linked thread. Please read it. If it isn't what you want or you still have a question afterwards, come back here & edit your question to state what you learned & what you still need to know. Then we can provide the information you need without just duplicating material elsewhere that already didn't help you.
Off-topic (only about software)
Questions that are only about software (e.g. error messages, code or packages, etc.) are generally off topic here. If you have a substantive machine learning or statistical question, please edit to clarify.
Questions that are only about software (e.g. error messages, code or packages, etc.) are generally off topic here. If you have a substantive machine learning or statistical question, please edit to clarify.
Deleted and re-posted a closed question
(Include link to deleted instance within the parentheses)
Please do not simply delete and repost [a closed question}(...).
Instead, please follow our guidance to edit and improve the closed
post. Any edit will automatically put it up for a vote on
reopening, and if enough voters agree that the post now is
acceptable, it will be reopened.
Vandalism
Please do not vandalize your question. When you posted on SE, you gave up exclusive ownership of the content under CC BY-SA 4.0. If there are no answers, you may delete your own question (see here): just click the faint gray 'delete' at lower left (your account needs to be registered for this). Otherwise, the thread will remain according to SE's rules.
Please do not vandalize your question. When you posted on SE, you gave up ownership of the content under [CC BY-SA 4.0](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/licensing). If there are no answers, you may delete your own question (see [here](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/what-to-do-instead-of-deleting-question) ): just click the faint gray 'delete' at lower left (your account needs to be registered for this). Otherwise, the thread will remain according to SE's rules.
XY Problem
It sounds to me like the problem you're trying to solve is
<X>
, and you're wondering if<Y>
is a good way to go about it. Is that fair? Because if your real question is "<X>
?" then I would suggest only asking about that. As it is written right now, the question appears to be an XY Problem.It sounds to me like the problem you're trying to solve is `<X>`, and you're wondering if `<Y>` is a good way to go about it. Is that fair? Because if your real question is "`<X>`?" then I would suggest only asking about that. As it is written right now, the question appears to be an [XY Problem](http://xyproblem.info/).
Cross posted question
Please don't cross post on multiple SE sites. Cross posting is against SE policy & wastes a lot of people's time. Decide which site you want your question on & only post there (or delete the copies elsewhere, as appropriate).
Please don't cross post on multiple SE sites. Cross posting is [against SE policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/64068/) & wastes a lot of people's time. Decide which site you want your question on & only post there (or delete the copies elsewhere, as appropriate).
I’m voting to close this question because it is cross-posted to [another site on stack exchange] with an answer there. In the future, please don't post the same question in multiple places. Instead, choose the community that is the best fit and ask it there.
I’m voting to close this question because it is cross-posted to [another site on stack exchange] with an answer there. In the future, please don't post the same question in multiple places. Instead, choose the community that is the best fit and ask it there.
Screenshot of equation, but not self-study
Hi, there are blind and visually impaired users of this site who interact with it using screen readers. The screen readers can't handle the equation in your screenshot. Please edit the post to include the equation as TeX. If it helps, we have some resources on using LaTeX on Cross Validated.
Hi, there are blind and visually impaired users of this site who interact with it using screen readers. The screen readers can't handle the equation in your screenshot. Please edit the post to include the equation as LaTeX. If it helps, we have some [resources on using LaTeX on Cross Validated](https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1605/155836).
Multiple closely related questions from same author
You have asked multiple very closely related questions. Please edit each of them to provide links to the others. This is so that people asking for clarifications or providing answers are aware of the context and do not duplicate efforts. Thank you!
You have asked multiple very closely related questions. Please edit each of them to provide links to the others. This is so that people asking for clarifications or providing answers are aware of the context and do not duplicate efforts. Thank you!
(The Answers section moved to a new post.)
Reference request, "Please do a search," etc.
In the years that this site has been active, variations on this question have been asked hundreds of times. There's a limit to how many questions can be linked as duplicates, but this should help you get started. If you feel these questions do not address your needs, please [edit] to explicitly state what you want to learn. But first, do a search. FAQ: Best Practices for Searching CV
In the years that this site has been active, variations on this question have been asked hundreds of times. There's a limit to how many questions can be linked as duplicates, but this should help you get started. If you feel these questions do not address your needs, **please [edit] to explicitly state what you want to learn.** But first [search](https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5549/).
Asking for using MathJax
Hi. Welcome to CV. This is a MathJax-enabled site. Please use this facility to typeset your mathematical expressions for better legibility. For a quick guide, check this Meta CV post: Instructions on how to use LaTeX on CrossValidated.
Hi. Welcome to CV. This is a MathJax-enabled site. Please use this facility to typeset your mathematical expressions for better legibility. For a quick guide, check this Meta CV post: [Instructions on how to use LaTeX on CrossValidated](https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1604/instructions-on-how-to-use-latex-on-crossvalidated).
Query (partly) based on ChatGPT
Courtesy to a brief conversation in Ten Fold
It seems you have sought a response from ChatGPT and (partly) used
it to frame your post. Please note that ChatGPT and similar Large
Language Models are often highly unreliable in formulating
coherent statistical assertions. Apropos to that, it is a common
precedent here to abstain from using such to create a post, and
to tread with caution here.
-
2$\begingroup$ @gung Thanks, I didn't know it was possible to format like that! A downside of having it display like this rather than all in one line, is that when copy-and-pasting, the text in the entry field also gets broken up across several lines. That doesn't matter once you press "add comment", since the it doesn't display broken up, but it does make editing a little harder. On the upside, it makes it clearer what exactly you're copying. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 21:01
-
2$\begingroup$ @Silverfish, I think its easier to copy&paste this way, but feel free to change it back if you prefer. Note that for the
[self-study]
comments: I use the 1st version if someone has identified that it's S-S & has made some attempt etc.; I use the 2nd version when someone copies&pastes their HW w/ nothing in the hopes someone will do it for them (& I'm feeling grouchy). I don't know if you want to add something to that effect in the post. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 31, 2015 at 0:22 -
3$\begingroup$ Just wanted to point to a useful SE app that you can set up (up to) six standard comments for: stackapps.com/questions/2116/… ... so for additional ease, pick six of the above and put them in the app. $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented May 26, 2015 at 0:45
-
1$\begingroup$ I've just set up the above app for myself (well, I did it yesterday) but haven't really used it live yet. Here's an example (below) of one of the default answers: $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Jun 4, 2015 at 3:14
-
1$\begingroup$ Once you set it up (Firefox or Chrome), it's a matter of clicking the "auto" link that shows up on the right when you have a comment box (immediately to the right of the one that says 'help') and either clicking the relevant comment or using the menu at the bottom to set up some of your own. $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Jun 4, 2015 at 3:28
-
3$\begingroup$ Having used the app actively for a while now, it makes the standard comments much easier. I think its limited number of default comments is fine, actually, it works to cover a large fraction of my regular commenting activity (I have set up a number of my own, or edited the defaults -- and after they paste in, I often edit the boilerplate, but its still faster than doing it from scratch) $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Sep 30, 2015 at 4:21
[Edit: It looks like the queues seem to have improved a little in recent times -- I find it easier to figure out why something closed for example -- so to an extent some of the gripes here may be a little out of date.]
I definitely agree that the interface in the various review queues is not as helpful as it should be -- it hides essential information that you then need to go elsewhere to find.
For example, trying to assess a "reopen" review - what's the first, most critical thing you need to know? Why it was closed in the first place -- but it's not on the screen! In the interface it takes fiddling around to get it - it's usually actually quicker to open the original in a new tab. That sort of thing makes me wonder if the person designing that interface actually does reviews. Other review queues have similar problems.
When doing various reviews I often pop up several additional tabs to get all the information I want to judge a review - most of which really ought to be readily available in the review screen I think, either directly or via links.
I'd usually recommend doing your final review actions (such as voting to close or whatever) in the review screen, so you at least get credit toward the badges, but the rewards-per-effort are pretty pathetic compared to other badges (250 reviews for a silver badge? much wow; compare that to a Constituent badge. "Yay, I clicked, gimme a silver badge.").
On the "Stock comments", some kinds of comments are generated in the process of voting to close (perhaps in some cases only if doing it on the post itself rather than in the review queue, I'd have to look through everything to be sure) - instead of appearing in a blue box, a standard comment will appear under the name of the person who voted by selecting some option in a dialog.
Some other comments are just pasted or typed. For example, I recently gave something like this comment:
Your question appears to be routine bookwork. Please add the
self-study
tag and read its tag wiki, modifying your question to follow the guidelines where necessary.
I do a lot of comments like that, but for me they're usually just typed from scratch every time.
Gung has some stock comments, but to me they usually seem to be the same each time, so I expect he's pasting them. I did seriously consider setting some script up to autogenerate the regular ones for me but I've never gotten around to trying to do that.
-
7$\begingroup$ I often go to the comments history on my userpage & copy&paste. I think the review queues are poorly designed; I find it interesting that you think the same & seem to have some of the same complaints I do. I always figured this was just a symptom of my curmudgeon-ness. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 25, 2015 at 20:14
-
3$\begingroup$ @gung Good reviewer and curmudgeon go together, it seems. Naturally we have it on good authority that correlation is not causation. $\endgroup$– Nick CoxCommented Mar 26, 2015 at 1:38
-
$\begingroup$ @gung I was wondering if you might consider posting an "answer" with some of your most useful comments. I've certainly found Glen_b's answer very helpful, and that would be useful too. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 27, 2015 at 21:24
-
$\begingroup$ I keep thinking about it, @Silverfish, but I'm not sure what I have to add to Glen_b's comments. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 3:17
-
$\begingroup$ @gung I've paid a visit to your comments history :-) If I've set this up correctly, tags and links should be easily copyable from the post I've cribbed together. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 30, 2015 at 20:24
-
$\begingroup$ "When you posted on SE, you gave up ownership of the content": not quite - the copyright is still yours, but you've licensed S.E. (& readers of your post) to publish it $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 30, 2022 at 23:58
-
$\begingroup$ Did you mean to comment under the other answer? I agree with the comment; while it links to the right place in the creative commons license it should be clearer that you have simply transferred some rights. Perhaps "gave up exclusive ownership" might work. (TBH ... I haven't used a stock comment in years. I had even forgotten that I had some) $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Jan 31, 2022 at 0:12
-
$\begingroup$ @Glen_b: I did, thank you. 'Exclusive ownership' is concise & - IANAL but I think it gets the idea across accurately $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 31, 2022 at 11:41
-
$\begingroup$ I don't think people expect us to be lawyers, we're just trying to get a general idea across, even if it's not correct legal jargon. $\endgroup$– Glen_bCommented Feb 1, 2022 at 0:38
Answers
Link-only answer
Welcome to the site. At present this is more of a comment than an answer. You could edit to expand it, perhaps by giving a summary of the information at the link, or we can convert it into a comment for you.
Welcome to the site. At present this is more of a comment than an answer. You could [edit] to expand it, perhaps by giving a summary of the information at the link, or we can convert it into a comment for you.
Welcome to the site. We are trying to build a permanent repository of high-quality statistical information in the form of questions & answers. Thus, we're wary of link-only answers, due to link rot. Can you edit to include a full citation & a summary of the information at the link, in case it goes dead?
Welcome to the site. We are trying to build a permanent repository of high-quality statistical information in the form of questions & answers. Thus, we're wary of link-only answers, due to link rot. Can you [edit] to include a full citation & a summary of the information at the link, in case it goes dead?
Code only answer
Although implementation is often mixed with substantive content in questions, we are supposed to be a site for providing information about statistics, machine learning, etc., not code. It can be good to provide code as well, but please elaborate your substantive answer in text for people who don't read this language well enough to recognize & extract the answer from the code.
Although implementation is often mixed with substantive content in questions, we are supposed to be a site for providing information about statistics, machine learning, etc., not code. It can be good to provide code as well, but please elaborate your substantive answer in text for people who don't read this language well enough to recognize & extract the answer from the code.
Ambiguous answer / comment / new question
Welcome to the site. Was this intended as an answer to the OP's question, a comment requesting clarification from the OP or one of the answerers, or a new question of your own? Please only use the "Your Answer" field to provide answers to the original question. You will be able to comment anywhere when your reputation is >50. If you have a new question, click the blue
ASK QUESTION
at the top of the page & ask it there, then we can help you properly. Since you're new here, you may want to take our tour, which has information for new users.Welcome to the site. Was this intended as an answer to the OP's question, a comment requesting clarification from the OP or one of the answerers, or a new question of your own? Please only use the "Your Answer" field to provide answers to the original question. You will be able to comment anywhere when your reputation is >50. If you have a new question, click the blue `ASK QUESTION` at the top of the page & ask it there, then we can help you properly. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Original poster posting a clarification to the question as a new answer
Unlike forum-style discussion sites, Cross Validated threads do not consist of a sequence of posts forming a conversation between the original poster and the answerers. We use a Q&A style where the question is posted once at the top, and is updated (using the "edit" button) where necessary for clarification. Sometimes it makes sense to ask a new, follow-up question instead of editing the old one. Please don't use the "answer" space to post clarifications to your own questions - have a look at the [tour] to understand how our site works.
Unlike forum-style discussion sites, Cross Validated threads do not consist of a sequence of posts forming a conversation between the original poster and the answerers. We use a Q&A style where the question is posted once at the top, and is updated (using the "edit" button) where necessary for clarification. Sometimes it makes sense to ask a new, follow-up question instead of editing the old one. Please don't use the "answer" space to post clarifications to your own questions - have a look at the [tour] to understand how our site works.
Low quality / too short
This is being automatically flagged as low quality, probably because it is so short. At present it is more of a comment than an answer by our standards. Can you expand on it? You can also turn it into a comment.
This is being automatically flagged as low quality, probably because it is so short. At present it is more of a comment than an answer by our standards. Can you expand on it? We can also turn it into a comment.
OP comments that he liked an answer, but does not upvote/accept
If you found this answer helpful, then please consider upvoting and/or accepting it.
If you found this answer helpful, then please consider [upvoting](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/why-vote) and/or [accepting](https://stats.stackexchange.com/help/accepted-answer) it.
Note that posting this about someone else's answer is often a good thing to do, while suggesting this about your own answer is better left for someone else to do.
OP accepts the first answer five minutes after it is posted
Oops ... thank you for accepting. However, seeing an accepted answer may discourage other users from answering (or even looking at your question), and they may have something better to say. So please consider un-accepting and seeing whether something better comes along. You can always re-accept later!
Oops ... thank you for accepting. However, seeing an accepted answer may discourage other users from answering (or even looking at your question), and they may have something better to say. So please consider un-accepting and seeing whether something better comes along. You can always re-accept later!
Answer used to ask question
Welcome to the site. Please do not use the "Your Answer" field to ask new or follow-up questions. Instead, click the blue ASK QUESTION link at the top of the page & ask there. If you want to address the author of an answer, you will need 50 reputation first to leave comments. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Welcome to the site. Please do not use the "Your Answer" field to ask new or follow-up questions. Instead, click the blue [ASK QUESTION](https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/ask) link at the top of the page & ask there. If you want to address the author of an answer, you will need 50 reputation first to leave comments. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Posts tentative answer & asks for feedback
Welcome to the site. Please don't post tentative answers and ask for feedback. [stats.SE] is strictly a Q&A site, not a discussion forum. If you want to ask about your understanding of something, please post it as a new question. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Welcome to the site. Please don't post tentative answers and ask for feedback. [stats.SE] is strictly a Q&A site, not a discussion forum. If you want to ask about your understanding of something, please post it as a new question. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Non-answer as answer
Please only use the "Your Answer" field to provide answers to the OP's question. CV is a strict Q&A site, not a discussion forum. Since you're new here, you may want to take our tour, which has information for new users.
Please only use the "Your Answer" field to provide answers to the OP's question. CV is a strict Q&A site, not a discussion forum. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Duplicate answer
This is very similar to the answer here. Please do not post duplicate answers. If you believe a question is completely answered by an answer elsewhere, flag / vote to close that question as a duplicate of the other. If it isn't completely answered by the other answer, customize your answer here to be more specific to the question.
This is very similar to the answer [here](). Please do not post duplicate answers. If you believe a question is completely answered by an answer elsewhere, flag / vote to close that question as a duplicate of the other. If it isn't *completely* answered by the other answer, customize your answer here to be more specific to the question.
Answer should have been a comment
Welcome to the site. This should be a comment; it isn't an answer by our standards. You will be able to comment anywhere when your reputation is >50. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Welcome to the site. This should be a comment; it isn't an answer by our standards. You will be able to comment anywhere when your reputation is >50. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Comment that would make a good answer
@: do you want to post your comment(s) as an answer? Better to have a short answer than no answer at all. Anyone who has a better answer can post it.
@: do you want to post your comment(s) as an answer? [Better to have a short answer than no answer at all.](https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5326/) Anyone who has a better answer can post it.
(Insert the commenter's nick after "@" so they are notified.)
General
Duplicate Account
Please register & merge your accounts (you can find information on how to do this in the My Account section of our help center), then you will be able to edit & comment on your own question.
Please register &/or merge your accounts (you can find information on how to do this in the **My Account** section of our [help]), then you will be able to edit & comment on your own question.
Answering a question but without upvoting it
Please see My upvoting policy, when you find a question sufficiently clear to write an answer, consider to upvote the question!
Please see https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6304/my-upvoting-policy, when you find a question sufficiently clear to write an answer, consider to upvote the question!
Non-English post
Welcome to the site. While it may seem unfair, Cross Validated is an exclusively English language based site. All posts here need to be made in English. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Welcome to the site. While it may seem unfair, [stats.SE] is an exclusively English language based site. All posts here need to be made in English. Since you're new here, you may want to take our [tour], which has information for new users.
Uses R's tidy-code
Welcome to the site. Please consider using base R, & commenting it extensively, when illustrating posts here with R code. Not everyone who will come to this page will be familiar with R, & not all of those will be able to read tidy-code. This is a Q&A site for statistics, not R.
Welcome to the site. Please consider using base R, & commenting it extensively, when illustrating posts here with R code. Not everyone who will come to this page will be familiar with R, & not all of those will be able to read tidy-code. This is a Q&A site for statistics, not R.
Question asked in chat
@ , please ask that on the main site. There we have better facilities for asking & answering questions (e.g. formatting options will work) and the information will be available for people with the same question. That isn't a chat item.
@ , please ask that on the main site. There we have better facilities for asking & answering questions (e.g. formatting options will work) and the information will be available for people with the same question. That isn't a chat item.
(Insert the commenter's nick after "@" so they are notified.)