Timeline for Should we remove the "datasets" close reason from the list?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 at 20:01 | history | edited | Andre Silva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
reworded to better address Tim's comments
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 7:33 | history | edited | Nick Cox | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 9, 2019 at 7:31 | comment | added | Nick Cox | I wonder if by authoritative you mean authoritarian. | |
| Apr 9, 2019 at 4:55 | comment | added | Tim Mod | Yes, because this thread asks about alternatives to the fact that it was declined. | |
| Apr 8, 2019 at 21:05 | comment | added | Tim Mod | The proposal that we have 4 close reasons was declined (as noticed in the question), this is not an option. | |
| Apr 8, 2019 at 20:10 | history | edited | Andre Silva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
not possible to edit blatantly off-topic close reason (which will only appear to <3k rep users: https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/283348/what-happens-to-questions-closed-as-blatantly-off-topic and https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/300056/why-are-there-two-different-close-reasons-for-);
|
| Apr 7, 2019 at 6:58 | comment | added | Tim Mod | (Not mine -1.) Only the three: "self-study", "data" and "software" reasons are editable by us. So your proposal would not work for us, otherwise I agree with the first part. | |
| Apr 7, 2019 at 2:21 | history | answered | Andre Silva | CC BY-SA 4.0 |