Timeline for Question put on hold after I already answered it: can I edit it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2017 at 21:06 | vote | accept | DeltaIV | ||
| Nov 6, 2017 at 19:38 | answer | added | amoeba | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 6, 2017 at 19:26 | history | edited | amoeba | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 6, 2017 at 15:48 | comment | added | DeltaIV | pardon, our edits: I didn't notice you also made an edit. | |
| Nov 6, 2017 at 15:44 | comment | added | DeltaIV | uh, sorry, no, I didn't upvote it because I didn't find it very clear (although indeed very useful), but at the same time not so unclear that it should be closed...an "average" question which didn't need either upvoting or downvoting, but which was "good enough" to be worth answering. I think it's quite clear now (after my edit), so I'll upvote: I hope that doesn't make me sound presumptuous! | |
| Nov 6, 2017 at 15:28 | comment | added | amoeba | BTW, why didn't you upvote the question? If you chose to answer it, then presumably you found it a "useful and clear" question, which are criteria for upvoting. | |
| Nov 6, 2017 at 15:08 | comment | added | amoeba | Apart from that, I am pretty sure that it's possible to accept answers on closed questions. | |
| Nov 6, 2017 at 15:08 | comment | added | amoeba | The question is not off-topic and I don't understand why it was closed as such. It does look rather unclear, at least for people not very familiar with the VGG16 architecture. I think you should edit (no need to remove the reference to the course, but make the Q clearer to everybody) and vote to reopen, sure. | |
| Nov 6, 2017 at 15:02 | history | asked | DeltaIV | CC BY-SA 3.0 |