Timeline for Rank-related tags are an enormous mess
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2020 at 14:30 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 15, 2017 at 11:01 | comment | added | Scortchi Mod |
I've swapped the tag names so that wilcoxon-signed-rank is now the synonym.
|
|
| Mar 13, 2017 at 16:39 | history | edited | ttnphns | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 156 characters in body
|
| Mar 13, 2017 at 13:42 | comment | added | ttnphns |
@amoeba, thank you for reply and clarification, and for potential agreement. I hope that my arguments in the answer could weigh sufficiently to do the re-tagging. Both tags ought to start with wilcoxon..., for me. (Thank you for creating the very topical thread on ranks.)
|
|
| Mar 13, 2017 at 13:36 | comment | added | amoeba | As I said elsewhere, the direction of a tag synonym (once the tags are merged, as these two are) makes almost zero practical difference. It's mostly a question of what tag name we like more. I don't have any strong opinion here, and I am certainly fine with doing the reversal that you suggest. Perhaps you are right and it will make more sense like that. The synonym was originally created this way simply because signed-rank-test was already an existing tag, there was no other reason. | |
| Mar 13, 2017 at 13:33 | history | edited | ttnphns | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Mar 13, 2017 at 13:26 | history | answered | ttnphns | CC BY-SA 3.0 |