Revisions to Matlab syntax highlighting now works on CrossValidated but does not turn on automatically

Commonmark migration

Source Link

edited Jun 11, 2020 at 14:30

1

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

replaced http://stats.stackexchange.com/ with https://stats.stackexchange.com/

Source Link

edited Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44

Community Bot

1

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/

Source Link

edited Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32

Community Bot

1

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment:

\o/ It's so working! All my posts suddenly became gorgeous! – Adriaan May 20 at 15:59

So it might be that the automatic highlighting for matlab has not been rolled in specifically on CrossValidated. Hence I post it as a bug.

There has been this feature request on Meta.SE since 2012: Add syntax highlighting for the MATLAB language

In May 2016 it was marked as [status-completed] and the following answer was posted by an SE admin:

Matlab syntax support is rolling in.

This is basic syntax support without keywords, as these add a lot to the size of the highlighter and do not gzip well at all.

Still - comments should be comments and basic highlighting should work as expected.

This is great. I verified some time ago that it also works on our site: Matlab code gets highlighted correctly if I preface it with .

However, it does not work automatically when a thread carries a matlab tag. I noticed it now in this question. It seems that it does work on StackOverflow though, or at least that's how I interpret the following comment: